This
is another of those occasional updates that I issue as a supplement to
the individual performance reports, investment policy statements and financial
planning reports.
The
rates of return reflect the overall rate of return on all the funds that
I have managed since 1981.
| Portfolio Return |
|
| Portfolio January 1, 2003 |
|
| Portfolio November 14, 2003 |
|
| Investment earnings 2003 |
|
| Investment Earnings 1981-2003 |
|
1. Portfolio Management
I wanted to re-emphasize that the returns in 2003 do NOT reflect a more aggressive and riskier posture. The portfolio continues to be managed using the same risk averse approach that we have employed over the last 23 years and that we will continue to employ for the next 23 years.
As I said in my last report, I am finding it increasingly difficult to
locate and purchase undervalued assets. Earlier this year bargains were
plentiful in many asset classes although there were not, ironically, many
bargains available in the favorite asset class of that period – bonds and
bond funds.
|
|
|
| Stocks |
|
| Real assets (oil, timber etc.) |
|
| Bonds – variable rate |
|
| Liquidations/Reorganizations |
|
| Precious Metals |
|
| Bonds – Fixed rate |
|
| Cash |
|
| TOTAL |
|
Highlights
of the allocation are as follows:
b. The allocation to common stocks is much reduced from earlier in the year when bargains were commonplace. We have our common stock money invested wisely, but too many of our holdings are now close to being fairly valued. On a net basis I am a seller although it would be unlikely that our common stock position would decline below 30% of the portfolio. Our International holdings are markedly cheaper than their domestic counterparts, but both sectors have seen significant price appreciation in the last six months.
c. We have 7.8% in the resource sector including our usual 5% allocation in gold. The latter has, once again, been an excellent contributor this year and we have been steady sellers to keep our gold position at, or below, 5%. This is our Armageddon insurance. :)
d. We are finding very few compelling opportunities where the possibilities of gain are significantly greater than the possibilities of loss. We will not take foolish risks with your, and our, money and we will not invest unless the odds are heavily in our favor.
3. Financial Planning
As we have mentioned before we are striving mightily to minimize your recorded
capital gains and dividend income in 2003 by various tax maneuvers and
especially by concentrating on effectively utilizing any potential realized
losses. The bad news is that losses are few and far between so our efforts
to minimize taxes will only be partially successful this year. This is
only mildly bad news as most people welcome the “problem” of having excess
gains. :)
We have sent out minimum distribution requests to those affected (if you
are over 70½ and have not yet made IRA withdrawals) and we need
those to be completed and mailed to Fidelity.
We will contact you prior to the end of the year re 4th quarter estimated
tax payments and also with any year end tax activities that we will recommend
on a case by case basis. We will send out your annual investment policy
statement in January and your annual financial planning statement in the
spring.
4. Summary
My expectations for the portfolio remain unchanged and they are that we expect in the medium and longer term to achieve a rate of return that exceeds the rate of inflation by 5% p.a. and that we expect to achieve this with muted volatility. This is a critical assumption in all of our financial planning and it forms the cornerstone of our financial planning summaries. We have met our targets, easily, in both the medium and longer terms and over the entire length of the portfolio. A look at the attached chart illustrates this point.
All of our financial planning is predicated on two things – that the portfolio will earn a target rate of return that is measured by the dotted line on the chart and that, importantly, the pattern of annual returns are not exceptionally volatile (i.e. that the portfolio is not subject to significant fluctuations). The target rate of return is a rate of return that equals the rate of inflation plus 5% (e.g. if inflation is 3% p.a. the target rate of return would be 8%). The lack of volatility in the portfolio is also a critical component in the successful accomplishment of our goals. The risks of volatility in a portfolio are covered in “Monte Carlo modeling” which measures the dangers of concentrating on an average rate of return and which shows, very persuasively, that the timing of any volatility is critically important in the success or failure of any plan. This is a lesson that many people have learned, too late unfortunately, in the aftermath of the bubble of the 1990’s.
As I said in my last report, I am becoming increasingly concerned about some of the imbalances in the world economy and the effect that those imbalances (and the cures) might have on asset prices around the world. I believe that the next 12 months in the financial markets could be really quite interesting. :) I have no predictions about the 12 months except for the fact that they have the potential to be volatile and challenging, that it is extremely unlikely that we will earn returns that match 2003 and, most importantly, that we will work diligently and conservatively on your behalf.
We appreciate your continuing support and we always appreciate feedback. You can reach me at Crewel@ aol.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|